User talk:Cshake

From Discovery Wiki
Revision as of 23:04, 4 August 2010 by Cshake (talk | contribs) (cleanup)
Jump to navigationJump to search

My content generator

http://cshake.homeip.net/flwiki/

Will change often, if it looks weird or has ugly looking output, I'm probably working on it while you're using it. Leave me a message here if you're unsure if it's producing something usable.

-cshake 22:14, 24 September 2009 (MDT)

Content Errors

The Hornviper MK I and MK II are both listed as beeing sold on Red Hessian bases by the content generator. FLstat disagrees [1]. I have verified this using FLstat. Tazuras 12:02, 4 May 2010 (MDT)

Fixed, turns out it was finding "rh_gun01_mark04" at the red hessian bases because they sell "fc_rh_gun01_mark04". Oops. ~cshake (talk) (sysop) 13:37, 4 May 2010 (MDT)

Thanks

I really appreciate what you are doing for this wiki. Thanks man. ~Chovynz~ (BlabsEgo) 12:59, 23 September 2009 (MDT)

idea: disclaimer

Quite often I try to explain the tech chart to new players and get 'i read it on the wiki' as the response. Prehaps add a disclaimer as part of the template for ships and weapons basicly saying to read the tech chart for the server being used rather than relying on the wiki as an accurate source. That, or add to the sidebar a 'server rules' tab, and link to sub-pages for the various servers rules (and delete a servers sub-page or mark as out dated if not updated within a set period of time)

--

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

Tomoe 00:56, 4 August 2010 (MDT)

I'm not entirely sure what you mean - ships and weapons here don't say who can use them, just who made them. The only usage notes I can think of here are the disclaimers on battleships saying you need the guard ID to use it. The Ship Portal, Ship Equipment, ID, and other pages include a link to the Tech Chart page in the first section, which explicitly says that "i read it on the wiki" is not a valid excuse. I admit that it could be more visible, and will add some more links, but I won't go so far as to put it in large red font on the front page (for the sake of all of us that already know).
~cshake (talk) (sysop) 17:00, 4 August 2010 (MDT)