Discovery Wiki:Page Deletion

• All pages nominated for deletion need a section on this page marked with a timestamp to indicate the date of nomination. A timestamp can be produced by signing the entry with four tildes ( ~~~~ )
• Pages that are nominated for deletion will be given a grace period of one week to discuss the proposition in full. If no valid arguments against the deletion of the page are given, a moderator will remove the page from the wiki at that point. Note that a deleted page can be recreated following its deletion.

See also: Category:Pages up for deletion

Samura Heavy Industries (player Faction) (DELETED)

Misscapitalized and a new page was created rather than moving this one.

-- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 01:28, 22 February 2009 (MST)

Samura Heavy Industries (player faction) (DELETED)

Name of player faction is different than the NPC faction so it does not need (player faction). A new page was created rather than moving this one.

-- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 01:28, 22 February 2009 (MST)

Unknown-1 (DELETED)

This article is out of Discovery context.

-- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 01:42, 22 February 2009 (MST)

Delete away -Tazuras

Robots (DELETED)

This article was originally about Planet Gammu but not in Discovery context.

-- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 01:42, 22 February 2009 (MST)

Deletion ok by me -Tazuras

Image:1stHeader.jpg (DELETED)

Proposed for deletion by original uploader, User:Nathrael.

-- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 03:04, 23 February 2009 (MST)

Template:Samura Infobox (DELETED)

Template:Faction Infobox should be used for all faction infoboxes.

-- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 03:59, 24 February 2009 (MST)

Category:Diplomacy Templates (DELETED)

These templates have been made obsolete by Template:Faction Diplomacy.

-- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 04:37, 24 February 2009 (MST)

Template:Allies

This template is not a template and has been made obsolete by Template:Faction Diplomacy. This "template" is in use on most faction pages, but since that's simply transcribed wiki markup this page is useless. We will need to replace usage occurances of this "template" with Template:Faction Diplomacy

-- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 04:40, 24 February 2009 (MST)

I wouldn't say it's obsolete by Template:Faction Diplomacy, as the new template is far too large to be properly used for every NPC faction in my opinion (iirc it was intended for player factions anyways). I would not replace the old one with this one - the old one is doing a fine job and I don't think it would look good if we had full rep sheets on every page that make up 80% of it's content. Template:Faction Diplomacy is nice, but I think it should one be used on player faction pages.:: Nathrael :: ^{Talklink Datalink Commlink}

Let me repeat myself, it is not a template. The wiki markup has just been copied to the different pages. Therefore it makes no practical difference if we delete the template. Also, I agree with you that Template:Faction Diplomacy has a tendency to become too large. But to be fair, so does Template:Allies if used in the same way. It is a problem with both solutions. To fix this problem, I have proposed a way of using Template:Faction Diplomacy in a better way on Template talk:Faction Diplomacy. As far as design goes, Template:Faction Diplomacy has more potential to be a universal diplomacy template, so for the sake of consistency I highly recommend that we focus on improving it rather than using multiple separate templates. -- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 09:40, 28 February 2009 (MST)

Category:Kirche die Grunnen Alders followers

Not only horribly misspelled (it should be "Kirche des Grünen Adlers") but also, in my opinion, not really necessary; I think for now, until the Wiki grows, a "People" category is more than enough. Nathrael 03:12, 17 March 2009 (MDT)

Gerhard Barkhorn

No. Just no. Go and look for yourselves. Also, please take a look at all the categories and subcategories this page belongs to; maybe we should delete them too, for the reasons mentioned under the Kirche des Grünen Adlers entry.... Nathrael 03:12, 17 March 2009 (MDT)

Template:System Base

Not used by any page; not really useful anymore. Nathrael 10:54, 22 March 2009 (MDT)

KuriosTalkLibbyB

This is a ship proposal which has gained no support on the forums, not a bad idea on use of the wiki but should only be used for ongoing projects, not initial proposals. Tazuras 21:39, 20 April 2009 (MDT)

User Talk page? Kurios 09:46, 21 April 2009 (MDT)

I have moved the page to where it should be and where I believe Kurios intended it to be: User:Kurios/LibbyB -- Eyvind (talk • contrib) 10:01, 21 April 2009 (MDT)