YellowWarningTriangle.png This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date.

Discovery Wiki:TODO

From Discovery Wiki
Revision as of 06:33, 30 December 2008 by Blodo (talk | contribs) (→‎Templates)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Please strikethrough or delete the entry as it is dealt with. Use <s> and </s> tags for strikethrough text.


Images

Reasons: Pictures don't follow the precedent of other alike images. These are to be edited at a later date, when renders or more suitable pictures can be made. These often will be in use already and can be safely left as is, until a better picture is uploaded. Watch for "dark images", discolored or bad framing.

Some images may need attention due to the content and image subject not really in context of each other. Others may need a better angle or different framing. Others may need better lighting or clearer focus.

Ships: Zoner Juggernaut Advanced Train Albatross Battlecruiser Armored_Transport Anubis Arrow Arwing Avenger Train Spatial Train Battlestar Battlestar_Advanced Viper_Mk_II Zoner_Juggernaut Firefly Outcast_destroyer Waran Bomber Tenabras Praetorian Bumblebee

Albatross_Battlecruiser (Media)

Other: Gaians Kusarinavalforces Niobium (possible replace with silver icon already in use)

Bases: Bruchsal_Base

Systems:


Images Required

All ships that require an image: Please add these only if you have a Render, or if you have a picture similar to the Odin. Take note of the angle, the graphics style, rendering, lighting. That is the level of quality we want for images. Collated ship list

All factions that require an image: Please add something that is relevant to the faction. Collated faction list

Templates

All ships that need template applied correctly: All ships have template applied

All factions that need template applied correctly:

Data needs to be added/revised later on

This should list pages where data is missing or article needs a complete or partial rewrite or there is something that needs to be looked at a later date. Might as well list a reason, so it is easier later to take a look at the right place. At the moment there are sorting problems in a lot of articles. I list the article names here, so whoever knows how to fix this should also verify that all sortable columns work before striking the article name from the list.

  • Fighters - Sorting in hull column does not work
  • Bombers - Sorting in bats broken
  • Torpedoes - Sorting in range works, but misses 'm' units. If they are in place then the sorting does not work.
  • Mines - $-signs needed so that the sorting works
  • Cruise Disruptors - $-signs needed so that the sorting works
  • Countermeasures - $-signs needed so that the sorting works
  • Transports - Weapons column sorts wrong. It sort alphabetically. But there is nothing to be done unless weapons colum is divided into separate guns and turrets column. I don't think it's worth the trouble.
  • Capital ships - Weapons column in all the lists. It's the same as in above.
  • Liners - Weapons column. Still the same as in above. Nothing to be done unless separation is made.
  • Missiles - All the info is missing.
  • Class 9 Guns - Where's the BH's Buckshot? --Looqas 06:30, 17 December 2008 (MST)



  • Thrusters - needs to be made a sortable list. Cheetah thruster is still missing.
  • Armor - needs to be made a sortable list

Incorrect Content

Inconsistent Content

Commodities

The commodities have inconsistent content. I'd like to see them all become similar with the same headings. e.g. Slaves do not have places selling them in it, Jump_Gate_and_Trade_Lane_Parts do. Diamonds had "Availability" instead of "Selling Places". Please pick one method and stick to it. All commodities should have places where they are sold at under one heading name (preferably "Availabilty" to be consistent with ships and to sound "more professional"), and any "illegal" commodity should have it's legal status underneath those too. (I would go so far as to say all commodities need it, but that might be stretching the necessary info and making redundant obvious data.)

If you have any ideas to better this "Selling Places" vs "Availabilty" please let me know. -Chovynz 17:31, 30 October 2008 (MDT)