Difference between revisions of "Talk:New York"
From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
I think this would be quite ok, but it should be updated to reflect Discovery changes. And I think we should also note what can be mined in the system (wouldn't be very spectacular in New York, but it might be interesting for Colorado, for example). | I think this would be quite ok, but it should be updated to reflect Discovery changes. And I think we should also note what can be mined in the system (wouldn't be very spectacular in New York, but it might be interesting for Colorado, for example). | ||
| + | |||
| + | When we update this info, we could offer the updated content to the Admins to add it in the next version, that would improve Discovery, I think. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 07:10, 21 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 07:10, 21 May 2008
What are we going to do about normal Systems? The infocard is only as follows:
It doesnt take in account all the discovery additions.
Settled Planets
Bases
- Fort Bush
- Newark Station
- Trenton Outpost
- Detroit Munitions
- West Point Academy
- Norfolk Shipyard
- Baltimore Shipyard
- Battleship Missouri
Corporations
- Ageira Technologies
- Interspace Commerce
- Universal Shipping
- Deep Space Engineering
- Liberty Police, Inc
Criminals
Produces
I think this would be quite ok, but it should be updated to reflect Discovery changes. And I think we should also note what can be mined in the system (wouldn't be very spectacular in New York, but it might be interesting for Colorado, for example).
When we update this info, we could offer the updated content to the Admins to add it in the next version, that would improve Discovery, I think.
Nodwick 07:10, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
