I actually came to say that I was okay with the Order numbers. IDK what Shaggy is trying to pull on me.
(10-22-2017, 09:46 PM)Ryummel Wrote: [ -> ]I would feel incredibly pleased if the Aoi peeps stopped posting. Danke
sure daddy
(10-22-2017, 09:42 PM)Loyola Wrote: [ -> ] (10-22-2017, 09:30 PM)Shaggy Wrote: [ -> ] (10-22-2017, 09:27 PM)Sici Wrote: [ -> ] (10-22-2017, 08:34 PM)Foxglove Wrote: [ -> ]Using the server crash to log gunboats and cruisers to counter the opposing side is pretty poor sportsmanship. Don't do it.
They all died to 2 KDS in the end, so I guess having such numbers is justified.
But let's say, you happily out numbered Golanski's fighter in a 2 v 1, but then run away and switch characters to |Aoi and sit idle with KDS until the Order| / BD| and GC returned.
Golaski was lagging on my screen before the second crash. I've logged other ship then we had 1v1 again, as other Aoi CDed other caps.
https://i.imgur.com/wcp5idW.png
Closest Aoi snub is 2k away, golanski is running for base and GB and another Order snub is pulling in.
Then Outsune joined so we had 2v2, but then BD| GB and Golanski himself docked because they seemly didn't do any damage, leaving ORG snub alone.
https://i.imgur.com/VLROlmw.png
BD| GB engaged as it was 2v1 on Golanski, ORD snub showed up and BD| docked as to not gank. but this is a feedback for the Order| so I'm unsure why you've brought us up anyway.
My ingame comments reffering to "2v1" and other lines that were used in local and system-wide were when additional fighter piled up to an existing duel. Since it was group fight, I kinda expected it to happen (and I suppose both sides did it several times during Tohoku battle) and my character's remarks are to be taken purely as role play one-liners of said char.
As for re-logging. Aoi did the same, I am not really mad about it and Order| itself kept it to absolute minimum. We would've otherwise retreated and brought other ships if it weren't for repeated server crashes. I think Thundie appreciated ships more equal to his battleship. I do not actually think that anyone anywhere is actually mad about Tohoku, short of funny (from post-action perspective) misunderstanding about me pulling out of a fight while everyone did not accounted for fact I was PvPdead at this point.
Suggestion for the future is perhaps not to apply so much pressure to few ships until we're certain that we're able to mount adequate defensive?
Hi...I rarely (these days) come into a factions feedback unless its something out of hand... but this needs to be addressed.
![[Image: RQ7wasm.png]](https://i.imgur.com/RQ7wasm.png)
I dont appreciate someone making a mockery of my SRP that i have had for years. The Order in particular who knows my SRP Very well. All I am asking is for you to please change the name. No need to escalate this further.
(04-02-2018, 08:20 AM)Kalhmera Wrote: [ -> ]Hi...I rarely (these days) come into a factions feedback unless its something out of hand... but this needs to be addressed.
I dont appreciate someone making a mockery of my SRP that i have had for years. The Order in particular who knows my SRP Very well. All I am asking is for you to please change the name. No need to escalate this further.
And you on what basis have decided, what is it a plagiarism of your name in general?
Or do you think that there everything is known about your battleship?
Guys, I have a question for you about Freeport Attack 11.5. This is the base of the Zoners, right? Then why are you attacking this PoB? You have the same peace with the Zoners, do not you? And the past attack was also some kind of delirious - then you were not even in a state of war. I want to know inRP reason for your actions.
I just did not understand why all this.
(04-02-2018, 08:20 AM)Kalhmera Wrote: [ -> ]Hi...I rarely (these days) come into a factions feedback unless its something out of hand... but this needs to be addressed.
I dont appreciate someone making a mockery of my SRP that i have had for years. The Order in particular who knows my SRP Very well. All I am asking is for you to please change the name. No need to escalate this further.
Not the 1ic, not the 2ic but in HC. Hi, I've decided to step in here to clarify it. This should not be intentional. We wouldn't want to troll you or anything with such a thing. We recently have an old veteran returning and seeing this I figured he might simply used a shipname from the times he was around (that's like 2007-2012). I will forward this to the chat anyways so we can get this renamed asap. Thanks for bringing this to our attention before it causes any missunderstandings.