09-08-2009, 03:07 AM
**Target Communications Relay: Found**
**Datalink connected...**
Hullo, Delegates.
Question! Clarification has been requested, and should the answer be unsatisfactory, they would make a recommendation. What is our policy regarding NFZ violations? Aside from a smack on the hand, what is it we do? And how could this help us with our QCP issues?
Well, the following was run by me as a suggestion to resolve an issue or two. Please note, it appears to have originated from Liberty. Hence the garbled nature.
So my suggestion is such. Make some sort of reports center (or alter the present ones) to cover the documentation of individuals launching attacks from our Freeports. Following the evaluation of proof presented, a public statement would be made indicating that they are no longer under the protection of our stations. Should they attempt to flee into the NFZ of one of our stations, any Zoner present could assist the House forces in the disabling of the unwelcome visitor or ask kindly for them to run elsewhere, and if they abide, give themselves a high five.
... Or something along those lines. This would also help with the case from the Liberty government (Comms Section: Diplomatic Matters) as well as stop the QCP from breathing down our necks by fabricating tales of Corsair assaults via Gran Canaria. We'd give them the power to prove it, and if they failed, then we chuckle silently to ourselves and say, "Guess you're crazy!"
Paddy O'Donaghue,
Captain of the OSI-Lazarus (IV)
**Uplink terminated**
**Datalink connected...**
Hullo, Delegates.
Question! Clarification has been requested, and should the answer be unsatisfactory, they would make a recommendation. What is our policy regarding NFZ violations? Aside from a smack on the hand, what is it we do? And how could this help us with our QCP issues?
Well, the following was run by me as a suggestion to resolve an issue or two. Please note, it appears to have originated from Liberty. Hence the garbled nature.
Dieter Schprokets Wrote:I keep saying there is one compromise.Now, I'm aware of the new NFZ policy, Section III Article B. I am also aware of our NFZ Violation reports department, but this person's suggestion has one distinct difference: the use of our Freeports as a staging area. I furthermore understand that we do not condone and indeed persecute the staging of attacks, but! - This would provide power to the people. Indeed, many people simply report somebody blasting another within the sphere, but nobody eyeballs a flight of, say, Corsairs then traces their progress to an attack on a House installation.
Zoners start a thread (maybe one for each Freeport?) "NFZ Abusers"
If someone is using a FP as a base to launch raids from, or a "safe zone" to hide in after piracy, he gets reported there.
Post 1 by lawful pilot : "Pirate X is using FP 1 as a base to raid Cambridge. Here are screenys"
Post 2 by TAZ/COZ "Ok, go nuts, he is no longer protected at the Freeport"
So my suggestion is such. Make some sort of reports center (or alter the present ones) to cover the documentation of individuals launching attacks from our Freeports. Following the evaluation of proof presented, a public statement would be made indicating that they are no longer under the protection of our stations. Should they attempt to flee into the NFZ of one of our stations, any Zoner present could assist the House forces in the disabling of the unwelcome visitor or ask kindly for them to run elsewhere, and if they abide, give themselves a high five.
... Or something along those lines. This would also help with the case from the Liberty government (Comms Section: Diplomatic Matters) as well as stop the QCP from breathing down our necks by fabricating tales of Corsair assaults via Gran Canaria. We'd give them the power to prove it, and if they failed, then we chuckle silently to ourselves and say, "Guess you're crazy!"
Paddy O'Donaghue,
Captain of the OSI-Lazarus (IV)
**Uplink terminated**